From bounce-debian-bugs-dist==chris-lamb.co.uk@lists.debian.org Sun Apr 20 19:42:30 2008
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100])
	by chris-lamb.co.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <bounce-debian-bugs-dist==chris-lamb.co.uk@lists.debian.org>)
	id 1JneUa-0000Ub-S8
	for bot.address@chris-lamb.co.uk; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:42:30 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
	id BC6E813A509A; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:42:23 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,LDO_WHITELIST,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.3
X-Original-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-bugs-dist@liszt.debian.org
Received: from rietz.debian.org (rietz.debian.org [140.211.166.43])
	by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D29713A4FBF;
	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:42:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)
	id 1JneOQ-0005sQ-G8; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:36:02 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#476846: Bug does NOT happen for sid version (9:1.1.7.1-1) of genisoimage  on armel
Reply-To: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com>, 476846@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:36:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.476846.B476846.120871643018801@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 476846
X-Debian-PR-Package: genisoimage
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
X-Debian-PR-Source: cdrkit
Received: via spool by 476846-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B476846.120871643018801
          (code B ref 476846); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:36:01 +0000
Received: (at 476846) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2008 18:33:50 +0000
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from relay1.allsecurenet.com ([66.111.57.92])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <tim@buttersideup.com>)
	id 1JneMI-0004sh-6h
	for 476846@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:33:50 +0000
Received: from [87.194.253.157] (helo=zebedee.buttersideup.com)
	by relay1.allsecurenet.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <tim@buttersideup.com>)
	id 1JneM9-0001lS-4X; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:33:42 +0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zebedee.buttersideup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCA66F9C3;
	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:33:37 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <480B8C81.80202@buttersideup.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:33:37 +0100
From: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com>
User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20080304)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tobias Frost <tobi@coldtobi.de>
CC: Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org>, Barry Tennison <barry@ukph.org>, 
 476846@bugs.debian.org,  martinwguy@gmail.com, 
 Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
References: <480B0ED9.3060403@ukph.org>  <20080420152441.GQ646@p12n.org> <1208715782.6035.5.camel@moria>
In-Reply-To: <1208715782.6035.5.camel@moria>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scan-Signature: 2e6fca1653f21f0f57637f35f01aec6c
Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:36:02 +0000
X-Debian-Message: from BTS
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2007-10-04_01
X-Mailing-List: <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/343725
X-Loop: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org
Received-SPF: none
X-SPF-Guess: pass
X-Spam-Score: -42.5
X-Spam-Report: (-42.5 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-50 D_FOR_BOT              For debian-devel-changes bot
	0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO       Received: contains a forged HELO
	0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	10 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 10:24 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
>   
>> No, it's not an endian problem.  i386, amd64, arm, and armel are _all_
>> little-endian.
>>     
>
> MMmmh, I always thought arm and armel differs in endianess...
>   

Nope, some packing, and syscall, and FP differences.  If you have a 
sid/armel install, or an etch/arm install you can install a sid/arm 
chroot under it (using debootstrap), and test that if you suspect armel 
vs arm....

Ta,

Tim.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


