From bounce-debian-bugs-closed=ddc=ddc.chris-lamb.co.uk@lists.debian.org Sun Apr 20 18:20:23 2008
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100])
	by chris-lamb.co.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <bounce-debian-bugs-closed=ddc=ddc.chris-lamb.co.uk@lists.debian.org>)
	id 1JndD6-0008Uw-VZ
	for ddc@ddc.chris-lamb.co.uk; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:20:23 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
	id 7BF0E13A500F; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:20:15 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>
X-Original-To: debian-bugs-closed@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-bugs-closed@liszt.debian.org
Received: from rietz.debian.org (rietz.debian.org [140.211.166.43])
	by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96A813A4FA7;
	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:20:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)
	id 1JndAw-0006dU-N5; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:18:02 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420)
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Frank =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=BCster?= <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Subject: Bug#403026: marked as done (TeX Policy, TEXMFSYSCONFIG and TeXlive)
Message-ID: <handler.403026.D403026.120871175720597.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
References: <87k5isxx0t.fsf@riesling.zuerich.kuesterei.ch>
 <86fybi6gtm.fsf_-_@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
X-Debian-PR-Message: closed 403026
X-Debian-PR-Package: tex-common
X-Debian-PR-Source: tex-common
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1208711882-25439-0"
Sender: Debian BTS <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:18:02 +0000
X-Debian-Message: from BTS
Resent-Message-ID: <Zgo_5Mq0HHL.A.GrH.Pt3CIB@liszt>
Resent-From: debian-bugs-closed@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-bugs-closed@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/133052
X-Loop: debian-bugs-closed@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-bugs-closed.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-bugs-closed@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-bugs-closed-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-closed-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-closed-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-bugs-closed-request@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:20:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received-SPF: none
X-SPF-Guess: pass
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Report: (-2.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.2 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1208711882-25439-0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8


Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:21:22 +0200
with message-id <87k5isxx0t.fsf@riesling.zuerich.kuesterei.ch>
and subject line This has long been settled and solved
has caused the Debian Bug report #403026,
regarding TeX Policy, TEXMFSYSCONFIG and TeXlive
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--=20
403026: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D403026
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

------------=_1208711882-25439-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Dec 2006 08:17:25 +0000
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186])
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Guldi-0006If-CI
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:08:27 -0800
Received: from [84.75.132.143] (helo=localhost)
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis),
	id 0ML21M-1Guld73DXl-0002PS; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:07:52 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Guld7-0002DJ-6G
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:07:49 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: Debian TeX maintainers <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Subject: TeX Policy, TEXMFSYSCONFIG and TeXlive (was: lenny release goals and the tetex->texlive transition)
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
In-Reply-To: <20061213171858.GE30281@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> (Norbert Preining's message of "Wed\, 13 Dec 2006 18\:18\:58 +0100")
References: <86d56o3lrn.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
	<20061213101525.GF3330@thinkpad>
	<86d56o3lrn.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
	<20061213171858.GE30281@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
From: Frank =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCster?= <frank@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:07:49 +0100
Message-ID: <86fybi6gtm.fsf_-_@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:3fc7da83a58b7314ee3070631872032d
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: tex-common
Version: 0.42
Severity: normal

Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:

> On Die, 12 Dez 2006, Frank K=FCster wrote:
>
>>     * Decide whether TeXlive continues to work with conffile links and a
>>       separate /etc/texmf/texlive, or switch to the teTeX scheme, and im=
plement
>
> I don't understand?


TEXMFSYSCONFIG=3D/etc/texmf

Consequently, the files that are now below /etc/texmf/texlive could be
at their "ordinary" places instead,=20

/etc/texmf/texlive/dvips/config.ps -> /etc/texmf/dvips/config

and the symlinks removed.  The current setup is a bit against the
written TeX policy, but it's necessary for cooperation with tetex.  Now,
if we drop tetex, we can reconsider this: Either move them into their
ordinary texconfig locations, or keep it and change policy.

The drawback of the first (and of the way policy is written in general)
is that we get the same problem again if someone packages miktex in 10
years (or so), or that we need to deal with "shared configuration
files".  On the other hand, if we keep them in the texlive subdirectory,
the whole purpose of TEXMFSYSCONFIG is defeated.  I think the long
discussion about tetex's adoption of this hierarchy has shown that the
issue is complex, but that all in all having and using TEXMFSYSCONFIG is
better.=20

Maybe shared configuration files are not a bad idea, I should look up
the Debian Policy about that.

Regards, Frank
--=20
Dr. Frank K=FCster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Z=
=FCrich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)


------------=_1208711882-25439-0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Received: (at 403026-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2008 17:15:57 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(2006-07-26) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <frank@kuesterei.ch>)
	id 1Jnd8u-0005IM-Is
	for 403026-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:15:56 +0000
Received: from riesling (p5B0AF3DD.dip.t-dialin.net [91.10.243.221])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0MKxQS-1Jnd8o2KGO-0003pd; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:15:50 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=riesling.zuerich.kuesterei.ch)
	by riesling with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <frank@kuesterei.ch>)
	id 1JndEA-0006Wg-PJ
	for 403026-done@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:21:22 +0200
To: 403026-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: This has long been settled and solved
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux)
From: Frank =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCster?= <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:21:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87k5isxx0t.fsf@riesling.zuerich.kuesterei.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+W4rWWpnbH0EcMFTUcDI8n122q2XS4+ymIMju
 M8zK/ytgMEotR/bqGNXUYoqZUhtcEDPjT0wZ49NlNybKoS4tBV
 cWd6t0inT1VlQmnjYJjzSI6CNJWHlev

Hi,

this bug was about whether texlive should continue to work with
conffiles in /etc/texmf/texlive, instead of /etc/texmf proper, and the
necessary changes to the TeX policy.

Since I cannot find a log entry about changes in the policy (not even in
the SVN log), I just close this bug without a version.

Regards, Frank

--=20
Frank K=FCster
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)


------------=_1208711882-25439-0--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-closed-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


