From bounce-debian-bugs-dist==chris-lamb.co.uk@lists.debian.org Sun Apr 20 18:39:50 2008
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100])
	by chris-lamb.co.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <bounce-debian-bugs-dist==chris-lamb.co.uk@lists.debian.org>)
	id 1JndVz-000096-LN
	for bot.address@chris-lamb.co.uk; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:39:50 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
	id E13A313A50C6; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:39:45 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=no version=3.2.3
X-Original-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-bugs-dist@liszt.debian.org
Received: from rietz.debian.org (rietz.debian.org [140.211.166.43])
	by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455AC13A4BAF;
	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:39:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)
	id 1JndVH-0008Gr-S0; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:39:03 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#436267: Firewire support in lenny
Reply-To: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>, 436267@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:39:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.436267.B436267.120871278732337@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 436267
X-Debian-PR-Package: linux-2.6
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 436267-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B436267.120871278732337
          (code B ref 436267); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:39:01 +0000
Received: (at 436267) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2008 17:33:07 +0000
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from baikonur.stro.at ([213.239.196.228])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <max@baikonur.stro.at>)
	id 1JndPW-0008Na-Hg
	for 436267@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:33:06 +0000
Received: by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id DABFB5C016; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:30:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:30:48 +0200
From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
To: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>, 436267@bugs.debian.org
Message-ID: <20080420173048.GC15111@baikonur.stro.at>
References: <20080420170215.GB2626@mathom.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080420170215.GB2626@mathom.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:39:03 +0000
X-Debian-Message: from BTS
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2007-10-04_01
X-Mailing-List: <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/343682
X-Loop: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org
Received-SPF: none
X-SPF-Guess: pass
X-Spam-Score: -35.2
X-Spam-Report: (-35.2 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-50 D_FOR_BOT              For debian-devel-changes bot
	0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	17 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 01:02:18PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> I've tried the 2.6.25-trunk kernel, and the latest in sid and as of 
> today (2008-04-20) the only way I can transfer videos from my dv camera 
> to my hard disk is with Holger's kernels (the ones with the old firewire 
> stack enabled). I do not understand why the debian kernel maintainers 
> are so unwilling to allow people to choose which firewire stack they 
> use. This is clearly a case of theory not matching reality--it is 
> irrelevant whether the new stack is conceptually cleaner if it doesn't 
> work with the software people are trying to use. In my experience, the 
> new stack is much better for firewire attached disks, but unusable for 
> video work. Are the people pushing for having only the new stack in the 
> debian kernels doing video work? 

boaah as debian developer can you please send in a proper bug report.
open a new bug with all your hardware info dmesg, lspci.
used firewire userspace components.
 
that would be a start to do something useful.

regards

-- 
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


