From eagle@windlord.stanford.edu Mon Apr 21 22:04:05 2008
Received: (at 472247) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2008 22:04:05 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(2006-07-26) on rietz.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER,
	HAS_BUG_NUMBER,VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Return-path: <eagle@windlord.stanford.edu>
Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu ([171.67.20.26])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <eagle@windlord.stanford.edu>)
	id 1Jo47I-0000XO-TF; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:04:04 +0000
Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A6B3660E801;
	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
	by smtp3.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD6160E174;
	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 87CA5E7911; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
To: Lior Kaplan <kaplan@debian.org>
Cc: 472247@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#472247: lintian: Please extend binnmu checks to include the Pre-Depends field
In-Reply-To: <20080322204531.6512.58293.reportbug@localhost> (Lior Kaplan's message of "Sat\, 22 Mar 2008 22\:45\:31 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
References: <20080322204531.6512.58293.reportbug@localhost>
From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Organization: The Eyrie
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:04:04 -0700
Message-ID: <87d4oij25n.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

package lintian
tags 472247 moreinfo
thanks

Lior Kaplan <kaplan@debian.org> writes:

> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.23.46
> Severity: normal
>
> Checking the bacula source package for binnmu competability, I noticed
> more problems than lintain reports.
>
> Please include the Pre-Depends field in the binnmu checks.

It already is, so there's some other problem.  Could you provide more
details on what problem lintian didn't find?

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>




