From bounce-debian-bugs-dist==chris-lamb.co.uk@lists.debian.org Sun Apr 20 19:50:17 2008
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100])
	by chris-lamb.co.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <bounce-debian-bugs-dist==chris-lamb.co.uk@lists.debian.org>)
	id 1Jnec8-0000Vu-9h
	for bot.address@chris-lamb.co.uk; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:50:17 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
	id D178313A5135; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:50:10 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,BLOGSPOT,BLOGSPOTURI,
	LDO_WHITELIST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SARE_MSGID_LONG40 autolearn=no version=3.2.3
X-Original-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-bugs-dist@liszt.debian.org
Received: from rietz.debian.org (rietz.debian.org [140.211.166.43])
	by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B5413A50EF;
	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:49:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <debbugs@rietz.debian.org>)
	id 1JneXB-0000wu-GG; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:45:05 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#477066: ftp.debian.org: Priority of libcap2 should be optional
Reply-To: "Torsten Werner" <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>, 477066@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: "Torsten Werner" <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: James Troup and others <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:45:04 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.477066.B477066.1208717000705@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 477066
X-Debian-PR-Package: ftp.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Keywords: 
Received: via spool by 477066-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B477066.1208717000705
          (code B ref 477066); Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:45:04 +0000
Received: (at 477066) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2008 18:43:20 +0000
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,BLOGSPOT,
	BLOGSPOTURI,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
	version=3.1.4-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185])
	by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>)
	id 1JneVT-0000Aq-R9
	for 477066@bugs.debian.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:43:20 +0000
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 4so408096nfv.17
        for <477066@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=erQ5qpcv2lrFC+g3DXCvP3MdIZeFaKPeVPOKsiOZUd8=;
        b=txmcCVW68ME1czbwz08oHeIunfwfpRnCUPW18yiCNH6PqA8QL3OtkOR4B4tnsjgA9G7ujXFSfcVXyH0y4Xqzdh33O2Zcorn29CDKkDUEWDlWnnZRY0fHCzv1R5GqBzEq5oMkEXMP/+AwQ+082RNsA6g9WWZoJHSL8+ZFs6R7Fjc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=gM7zItObId0hIiK1BNJaubL+qocsRbKH8x3QRAhqalI55qsQ5PbuJxz14buNnj6W6atqW+mN4+rcBzocgZJ+OuiyrV7inYAbp2T/8BZH1nuqDb3kWJa/kjgWXrqKwTIn7QQBDSHl+x2B0BysP0fs8lLJMYxo9MyjWXToC/3M4BM=
Received: by 10.78.148.15 with SMTP id v15mr5473640hud.37.1208716996550;
        Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.169.20 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a90bfcf0804201143m79db5130qda34951821943f5f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:43:16 +0200
From: "Torsten Werner" <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>
To: "Sven Joachim" <svenjoac@gmx.de>, 477066@bugs.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <87fxtgo02p.fsf@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <87fxtgo02p.fsf@gmx.de>
Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:45:05 +0000
X-Debian-Message: from BTS
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2007-10-04_01
X-Mailing-List: <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/343727
X-Loop: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-bugs-dist.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-bugs-dist-request@lists.debian.org
Received-SPF: none
X-SPF-Guess: pass
X-Spam-Score: -27.6
X-Spam-Report: (-27.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-50 D_FOR_BOT              For debian-devel-changes bot
	0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
	-2.6 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	25 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
>  The libcap2 package is currently of "Priority: Required", but there is
>  absolutely no justification for that.

There is: libcap2 is the successor to libcap1 which is of Priority:
Required. I am not sure if that is correct but both libraries should
have the same priority at least.

Cheers,
Torsten

-- 
http://twerner.blogspot.com



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


